Robinson Tryon (qubit)2016-03-11 10:09:11 UTC(In reply to Grega Bremec from ) The problem is, what I see in the font selection dialog, is only what is attached to this report.Side note: The ordering of the Styles in the dialog doesn't seem to follow numeric or alphabetical sort. That's rather distracting/seems inefficient.

• Helvetica Neue Lt Pro Lt

Perhaps a separate bug. If I type in the actual adornment manually (like, '45 Light'), the font is found (i.e. The message under the input box no longer says 'the closest matching style will be used', but rather that the 'same font will be used for print and screen'), but is never used in the document.I don't have Helvetica installed here - can you reproduce the problem with any fonts that ship with LibreOffice/your base system?

Grega Bremec2016-03-11 16:27:22 UTC(In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from ) (In reply to Grega Bremec from ) If I type in the actual adornment manually (like, '45 Light'), the font is found (i.e. The message under the input box no longer says 'the closest matching style will be used', but rather that the 'same font will be used for print and screen'), but is never used in the document. I don't have Helvetica installed here - can you reproduce the problem with any fonts that ship with LibreOffice/your base system?Unfortunately not. There are some TTFs with such style specification:/usr/share/fonts/open-sans/OpenSans-ExtraBold.ttf: Open Sans,Open Sans Extrabold:style=Extrabold,Regular.but in those, for some reason, the second name component is used, and not the first one as is in the case of OTF (not an expert here, but I'd understand if this naming inconsistency was a FC-related thing, too).So for OpenSans TTF family, I get four distinct fonts. Not for Helvetica Neue LT Pro OTF family - there is just one font for this one.The trick is, I can see by looking at styles.xml of my old templates, that the second name component was used from OTF too, judging from meta.xml, in LibreOffice/4.2.5.2. Yannick.D2017-08-06 20:03:49 UTCI can confirm this issue is still present in current versions.

In my experience Medium font weights are never shown in LO while others like Semi Bold are a hit and miss.I've attached screenshots of missing weights for three open-source fonts: Alegreya Sans v1.002, Lato v2.015 and Zilla Slab v1.1. But others are affected too like Roboto, Montserrat, Fira Sans, Cormorant, AFAIK bundled fonts aren't affected as they don‘t include more than 4 weights (standard, italic, bold, bold italic).(Maybe the title of this thread should be edited to 'Missing font weights (like Medium) in LO'.)Version: 5.4.0.3Build-ID: 7556cbc6811c9d992f4064abd7f62cCPU-Threads: 4; Betriebssystem:Mac OS X 10.12.5; UI-Render: Standard;Gebietsschema: de-DE (deDE.UTF-8); Calc: groupDownload Fonts. Copyright information: Please note that all contributions to The Document Foundation Bugzilla are considered to be released under the, unless otherwise specified. Source code form contributions such as patches are considered to be modifications under the.

Helvetica Neue Lt Pro Lt

'LibreOffice' and 'The Document Foundation' are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our.